← Back to Disclosure
SPLC Donors Dismiss DOJ Fraud Allegations as Farcical
Disclosure The Intercept Apr 24, 2026

SPLC Donors Dismiss DOJ Fraud Allegations as Farcical

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has faced fresh scrutiny from the Department of Justice (DOJ), which recently filed fraud charges against the organization, accusing it of defrauding donors by paying informants to infiltrate hate groups. However, more than two dozen SPLC donors have expressed skepticism and frustration over these claims, calling them laughable and unfounded.

Mary Wynne Kling, a longtime Alabama-based supporter of the SPLC, dismissed the DOJ’s allegations as an attack on the organization’s core mission. “We knew they were paying informants,” Kling told *The Intercept*. The SPLC has long used such tactics to gather intelligence on extremist groups, a practice that donors like Kling fully support. The group’s history includes bankrupting the United Klans of America in the 1980s and its renowned “Hatewatch” project, which documents far-right extremism.

The DOJ indictment, filed Tuesday in Alabama, accuses the SPLC of wire fraud and money laundering for allegedly funding hate groups through fictitious business entities. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel have framed the case as an effort to hold the SPLC accountable for deceiving its donors. However, many contributors view these charges as politically motivated attacks on the SPLC’s reputation.

Ellie Wilson, a Texas-based donor, even increased her contribution after learning of the indictment. “If my donation was used to pay for people who are infiltrating these groups,” she said, “I see no problem with it.” Maya Lenox, another donor, emphasized that such tactics are essential for the SPLC’s investigative work: “In order to obtain this information, you’re going to have to make it worth their time.”

Despite the DOJ’s allegations, 20 verified donors to the SPLC reaffirmed their support, with some expressing mild criticism of the group’s labor practices or other controversies. The case has sparked broader debates about the balance between investigative journalism and donor expectations, as well as the role of the DOJ in policing nonprofit organizations.

Read Original Article → ← Back to Disclosure