EEOC Sues New York Times Over Alleged Discrimination Against White Man

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed a lawsuit against the New York Times, claiming the company discriminated against a white man based on his race and sex. The suit, signed by several high-ranking EEOC officials including Benjamin North—a lawyer with a history of advocating for men’s rights—alleges that the unnamed male employee was passed over for a deputy real estate editor position in January 2025 because he did not meet the company’s diversity quotas.

North, who previously faced suspension as a college student over a rape allegation he denies, has long argued that Title IX, which prohibits gender discrimination in federally funded institutions, has been weaponized against men. His involvement in this case raises questions about the EEOC’s approach to enforcing anti-discrimination laws. The lawsuit claims that the New York Times intentionally made hiring decisions based on race and sex to meet its diversity goals, which the EEOC says violates federal law.

The suit comes amid President Donald Trump’s administration’s broader push to challenge diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. Critics argue that the EEOC is using this case to advance a political agenda, while supporters maintain it is a necessary step to ensure compliance with anti-discrimination laws. The New York Times has strongly rejected the allegations, calling them “politically motivated” and emphasizing its commitment to merit-based hiring practices.

Chai Feldblum, a former EEOC chair, expressed skepticism about the agency’s legal arguments, stating that the evidence presented in the complaint is weak. She noted that the claimant was not necessarily more qualified than the multiracial female candidate who ultimately received the position. The case highlights the ongoing tension between promoting diversity and ensuring fair employment practices, a debate that continues to divide opinions across the country.