← Back to Military
Senate Seeks New Combatant Command for Autonomous Warfare
Military Defense One Jun 11, 2026

Senate Seeks New Combatant Command for Autonomous Warfare

The Senate Armed Services Committee has proposed the creation of a new combatant command focused on robotic and autonomous systems within the Department of Defense. This initiative would see the establishment of a four-star general-led command aimed at accelerating the integration and development of unmanned warfare technologies across various domains, including sub-surface, surface, and aerial operations. The proposal is part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and draws inspiration from Ukraine's recent efforts to create specialized military units focused on drone warfare.

The proposed combatant command would possess unique test and evaluation authorities as well as limited acquisition capabilities to facilitate experimentation with emerging autonomous weapons systems. However, details regarding how this new entity will operate alongside existing initiatives like the U.S. Southern Command’s autonomous warfare group remain unclear. In April, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had also hinted at the Pentagon's plans to establish a sub-unified command dedicated to autonomous warfare.

Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia voted against the NDAA bill but supported the amendment for the new combatant command. He emphasized that while the amendment allows the DoD flexibility in shaping this initiative, it does not mandate its creation. Meanwhile, the Trump administration's $1.5 trillion defense budget request includes nearly $55 billion allocated to the Defense Autonomous Working Group (DAWG), with most of this funding contingent on approval from a reconciliation bill.

Critics like Senator Kaine are concerned that relying heavily on reconciliation bills for military spending undermines the traditional appropriations process and sets a precedent for future budgetary decisions. They argue that defense priorities should be addressed through standard appropriation channels to ensure bipartisan oversight and input. Despite these concerns, committee leaders remain optimistic about navigating the upcoming discretionary appropriations process alongside potential supplemental funding and reconciliation efforts.

Read Original Article → ← Back to Military