← Back to Politics
Michigan Senate Candidate Faces Backlash Over 'Ogre on a Pike' Comment
Politics By Art McEntyre · Jul 27, 2026

Michigan Senate Candidate Faces Backlash Over 'Ogre on a Pike' Comment

Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is under fire from within his own party after making controversial remarks during a recent donor meeting. According to audio obtained by POLITICO, El-Sayed used aggressive rhetoric to describe the stakes of his potential victory in the primary race against incumbent Representative Haley Stevens.

El-Sayed told donors that if he wins, "you know, primarying people like John Fetterman, I have no problem to do that," referring to a strategy of challenging established party figures. He later added, "Ideally you put one ogre on a pike, and then everyone else gets the message." These comments were interpreted as a metaphorical threat against political opponents.

The backlash was swift and came from multiple corners within the Democratic Party. Representative Hillary Scholten (D-Mich.) condemned El-Sayed's rhetoric, stating that violent and vulgar threats have no place in democratic electoral contests. She emphasized the need to lower the temperature rather than raise it, especially given rising incidents of political violence.

Other prominent Democrats also criticized El-Sayed’s remarks. Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, suggested that El-Sayed’s comments were an attack on the party itself rather than just Republicans. Fred Guttenberg, a gun control activist whose daughter was killed in the Parkland shooting, urged Michiganders to support Stevens and called for El-Sayed's defeat.

El-Sayed’s campaign spokesperson defended his comments, saying he was speaking metaphorically about supporting primary challenges against figures like John Fetterman, who has been critical of El-Sayed over Israel-related issues. The context of the "ogre" comment also stems from previous attacks on Fetterman by political rivals, including Kari Lake, a failed Republican gubernatorial candidate in Arizona.

The controversy surrounding El-Sayed’s comments highlights the increasingly tense atmosphere within the Democratic Party as it grapples with ideological divisions between progressive and moderate wings. This primary race is seen as crucial for shaping the party's direction leading up to the 2028 presidential election, making every comment and action particularly significant.

Neera Tanden, a centrist Democrat and president of the Center for American Progress, accused El-Sayed of sexism by suggesting his comments targeted Stevens specifically. Melissa Byrne, a former staffer for Senator Bernie Sanders, described El-Sayed's remarks as an "unforced error" that is "really bad and beneath the progressive project," though she later deleted her post.

The Republican Party has also seized on the controversy to criticize El-Sayed, with some leaning into stereotypes about his religion. Steve Guest, a former staffer for Senator Ted Cruz, tweeted: “Michigan Islamist discusses beheading his opponents,” adding fuel to the fire of political discourse.

El-Sayed is known for using aggressive rhetoric in the past, defending it as necessary to combat attacks from conservative critics. His campaign strategy often involves pushing back against what he perceives as unfair or biased criticism. The upcoming final Democratic Senate debate on Monday night will likely see Stevens and El-Sayed addressing these controversies head-on.

The outcome of the August 4 primary is expected to have significant implications for the broader direction of the Democratic Party, particularly in terms of how it navigates ideological tensions between progressive and moderate factions moving forward into future elections.

← Back to Politics