← Back to Crime
Minnesota Teacher Gets Lenient Sentence for Stepping on Students During Drill
Crime By Art McEntyre · Aug 1, 2026

Minnesota Teacher Gets Lenient Sentence for Stepping on Students During Drill

A 49-year-old teacher in Underwood, Minnesota, Jason Lowell Rogers, has received a lenient sentence following his guilty plea to stepping on the backs of three students during a lockdown drill last year. The incident occurred at an elementary school where Rogers was teaching sixth grade.

According to court documents, Rogers admitted to stepping on one student's back with both feet for about 10 seconds when he saw them lying down as part of the drill. This action caused significant distress and physical pain to the child, who reported feeling like something might be broken in his back. Rogers also confessed to stepping on two other students during the same incident.

Rogers was initially charged with one count of malicious punishment of a child, which later escalated to three charges after further investigation. The defendant faced prosecution for his actions that took place in March 2025 and was placed on administrative leave following the filing of these charges by the Underwood School District.

On July 28, Rogers received a stay of adjudication from Otter Tail County District Court, which means he will be sentenced to two years of probation. During this period, Rogers must surrender his teaching license in Minnesota and cannot teach anywhere else in the United States. Additionally, as part of his probationary terms, Rogers is required to complete an anger management assessment, perform 90 hours of community service, write letters of apology to each victim, and pay $2,250 in fines and fees.

The lenient sentence has sparked controversy among some observers who argue that the punishment does not adequately reflect the severity of the incident. Critics point out that Rogers' actions could have caused serious harm to the students involved and suggest that a more severe penalty might serve as a stronger deterrent for future incidents by other educators.

Supporters of the court's decision, however, highlight the fact that Rogers has already faced significant consequences through his administrative leave and public scrutiny following the incident. They argue that the stay of adjudication allows for rehabilitation while acknowledging the seriousness of the offense without permanently tarnishing Rogers' professional record.

The case underscores ongoing debates about appropriate disciplinary measures in educational settings and highlights concerns over student safety during drills and other emergency preparedness exercises. It also raises questions about the responsibilities and limits of authority for educators when managing classroom behavior, especially under stressful circumstances like lockdown drills.

As Rogers begins his probationary period, there is increased attention on ensuring that similar incidents do not occur in future, prompting discussions among educational administrators and policymakers to review safety protocols and staff training procedures.

← Back to Crime