← Back to Disclosure
New York Comptroller Faces Ethics Scrutiny Over Israel Trip Funded by Pro-Israel Group
Disclosure The Intercept Jun 1, 2026

New York Comptroller Faces Ethics Scrutiny Over Israel Trip Funded by Pro-Israel Group

The New York State Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government has raised concerns over a trip to Israel taken by state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli, which was sponsored by the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York (JCRC). The ethics commission approved reimbursement for the trip but noted potential ethical issues regarding the appearance of improper influence. This comes as DiNapoli faces increased scrutiny over his support for investments in Israel Bonds, a financial instrument that directly funds the Israeli government.

DiNapoli's journey to Israel was paid for by the JCRC, an organization with ties to Israel Bonds. The itinerary shows he was scheduled to meet with Israel Bonds staff during the trip. This sponsorship has raised eyebrows due to the potential conflict of interest and the perception that such trips could influence DiNapoli’s official duties as comptroller.

In a letter dated February 2, 2024, the ethics commission informed DiNapoli that several commissioners were concerned about the reimbursement potentially giving the impression that a person could improperly sway his decisions. The JCRC has received financial support from Israel Bonds for events such as the annual Israel Day parade in New York City, which DiNapoli regularly attends.

Critics argue that by participating in trips organized and funded by an entity closely aligned with Israel Bonds while also promoting investments in these bonds, DiNapoli is overstepping his role. Lisa Mulleneaux from Jewish Voice for Peace's "Break the Bonds" campaign asserts this behavior undermines public trust in the comptroller’s office and compromises the integrity of New York state’s investment decisions.

Despite the ethics commission’s approval of the reimbursement, questions remain about whether DiNapoli’s actions align with his statutory mandate as a fiduciary to millions of pensioners and public employees. The controversy underscores broader debates over ethical boundaries in government officials' international engagements and financial interests.

Read Original Article → ← Back to Disclosure