← Back to Crime
Judge Rejects Suspect's Motion to Disqualify US Attorney Over Trump Friendship
Crime Law & Crime Jun 22, 2026

Judge Rejects Suspect's Motion to Disqualify US Attorney Over Trump Friendship

Cole Tomas Allen, the 31-year-old man accused of attempting to assassinate former President Donald Trump at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner in April, has failed in his bid to remove U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro from his case. In a recent ruling, Judge Trevor McFadden dismissed Allen's arguments that Pirro's friendship with Trump creates an appearance of impropriety and conflicts of interest.

Allen had argued that Pirro should be disqualified due to her close ties with the former president and her public statements regarding the alleged assassination attempt. However, McFadden found no merit in these claims, stating that neither Pirro’s attendance at the dinner nor her subsequent comments about the incident indicate a conflict of interest. The judge also noted that while Pirro's friendship with Trump is acknowledged, it does not affect her impartiality or ability to prosecute Allen.

In his motion, Allen had specifically pointed out statements made by Pirro and Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche in the media following the alleged assassination attempt. He cited their descriptions of the incident as evidence of bias. However, McFadden ruled that such comments do not constitute a conflict of interest under existing legal standards. The judge emphasized that neither Pirro nor Blanche are likely to be trial witnesses and thus should remain involved in the prosecution.

The case has garnered significant attention due to its unusual circumstances and the high-profile nature of the alleged crime. When Allen was indicted for shooting a Secret Service officer and attempting to assassinate Trump, both Pirro and Blanche made strong statements about pursuing justice to the fullest extent of the law. Their actions have been consistent with their roles as federal prosecutors dedicated to upholding public safety and the rule of law.

This ruling underscores the judicial system's commitment to maintaining impartiality even in cases involving high-profile individuals like former President Trump, ensuring that legal proceedings are not unduly influenced by personal relationships or political affiliations.

Read Original Article → ← Back to Crime